Talk:Mosaic law
Appearance
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Greyshark09
[edit]Greyshark09, it appears that you are engaging in original research and synthesis, neither of which is allowed on Wikipedia. Instead of continuing to insist on your edits, I suggest you discuss them on the talk page, both of this article and Judaism (the other place where you are engaging in the same behavior). - Lisa (talk - contribs) 21:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Appears is a speculative word, thus making you the one engaging in a kind of synthesis. Meanwhile you are a proof to the stagnation theory which postulated information would experience "freeze" period, not allowing changes even though some of them are correct. Thank you for your time.Greyshark09 (talk) 22:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Greyshark, please read MOS:DAB before you make any more edits to this dab page. What you're doing here goes against it by a wide margin. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- That is the best objection to date. Makes sense, there is a problem in disambugation definition of this page on the first place. I'll think it over. Regards! Greyshark09 (talk) 22:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Greyshark, please read MOS:DAB before you make any more edits to this dab page. What you're doing here goes against it by a wide margin. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)